↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intraoperative neuromonitoring versus visual nerve identification for prevention of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in adults undergoing thyroid surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
Title
Intraoperative neuromonitoring versus visual nerve identification for prevention of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in adults undergoing thyroid surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012483.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberto Cirocchi, Alberto Arezzo, Vito D'Andrea, Iosief Abraha, Georgi I Popivanov, Nicola Avenia, Chiara Gerardi, Brandon Michael Henry, Justus Randolph, Marcin Barczyñski

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 219 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 14%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 24 11%
Other 20 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Other 43 20%
Unknown 60 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 2%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 74 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,192,040
of 16,502,216 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,932
of 11,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,649
of 341,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,502,216 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.