↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intraoperative neuromonitoring versus visual nerve identification for prevention of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in adults undergoing thyroid surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
308 Mendeley
Title
Intraoperative neuromonitoring versus visual nerve identification for prevention of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in adults undergoing thyroid surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012483.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberto Cirocchi, Alberto Arezzo, Vito D'Andrea, Iosief Abraha, Georgi I Popivanov, Nicola Avenia, Chiara Gerardi, Brandon Michael Henry, Justus Randolph, Marcin Barczyñski

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 308 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 12%
Researcher 28 9%
Student > Bachelor 28 9%
Other 23 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 7%
Other 54 18%
Unknown 117 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 1%
Social Sciences 4 1%
Other 36 12%
Unknown 134 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,412,473
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,934
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,093
of 447,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#101
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.