| Title |
Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating fractures of the middle third of the clavicle
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009363.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mário Lenza, Rachelle Buchbinder, Renea V Johnston, Bruno AS Ferrari, Flávio Faloppa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 25% |
| Finland | 1 | 6% |
| Austria | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 391 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 388 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 52 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 13% |
| Researcher | 30 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 6% |
| Other | 65 | 17% |
| Unknown | 145 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 135 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 8% |
| Psychology | 13 | 3% |
| Engineering | 8 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 32 | 8% |
| Unknown | 165 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,769,483
of 24,047,183 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,506
of 12,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,288
of 444,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#112
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,047,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.