↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating fractures of the middle third of the clavicle

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
411 Mendeley
Title
Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating fractures of the middle third of the clavicle
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009363.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mário Lenza, Rachelle Buchbinder, Renea V Johnston, Bruno AS Ferrari, Flávio Faloppa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 411 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 408 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 13%
Student > Bachelor 51 12%
Researcher 30 7%
Other 25 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 6%
Other 73 18%
Unknown 154 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 139 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 8%
Psychology 13 3%
Engineering 8 2%
Social Sciences 7 2%
Other 37 9%
Unknown 175 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,866,643
of 25,554,853 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,635
of 13,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,211
of 447,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#111
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,554,853 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.