↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
137 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
333 Mendeley
Title
Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007798.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joan Webster, Sonya Osborne, Claire M Rickard, Nicole Marsh

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 137 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 333 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 62 19%
Student > Master 36 11%
Researcher 23 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 7%
Other 19 6%
Other 60 18%
Unknown 110 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 80 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 79 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 5%
Psychology 7 2%
Unspecified 6 2%
Other 24 7%
Unknown 122 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2023.
All research outputs
#370,856
of 22,981,247 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#668
of 12,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,488
of 437,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,981,247 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.