↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
138 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
Title
Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007798.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joan Webster, Sonya Osborne, Claire M Rickard, Nicole Marsh

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 138 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 216 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 18%
Student > Master 30 14%
Researcher 18 8%
Other 16 7%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Other 42 19%
Unknown 57 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 66 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 61 28%
Psychology 4 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 <1%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 67 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 98. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2021.
All research outputs
#279,114
of 18,911,518 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#540
of 11,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,988
of 352,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,911,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.