The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Drug‐eluting balloon angioplasty versus uncoated balloon angioplasty for the treatment of in‐stent restenosis of the femoropopliteal arteries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012510.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ahmed Kayssi, Wissam Al‐Jundi, Giuseppe Papia, Daryl S Kucey, Thomas Forbes, Dheeraj K Rajan, Richard Neville, Andrew D Dueck |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 11% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Guatemala | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 19 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 36% |
| Scientists | 5 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 169 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 15% |
| Unknown | 64 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 80 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,494,907
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,180
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,895
of 453,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#71
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.