↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

School‐based self‐management interventions for asthma in children and adolescents: a mixed methods systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
35 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
742 Mendeley
Title
School‐based self‐management interventions for asthma in children and adolescents: a mixed methods systematic review
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011651.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine Harris, Dylan Kneale, Toby J Lasserson, Vanessa M McDonald, Jonathan Grigg, James Thomas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 742 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 741 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 80 11%
Student > Bachelor 65 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 8%
Researcher 50 7%
Other 32 4%
Other 127 17%
Unknown 327 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 118 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 112 15%
Social Sciences 32 4%
Psychology 27 4%
Unspecified 12 2%
Other 88 12%
Unknown 353 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,015,755
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,021
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,868
of 451,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.