↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

School-based self-management interventions for asthma in children and adolescents: a mixed methods systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
35 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
407 Mendeley
Title
School-based self-management interventions for asthma in children and adolescents: a mixed methods systematic review
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011651.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine Harris, Dylan Kneale, Toby J Lasserson, Vanessa M McDonald, Jonathan Grigg, James Thomas

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 407 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 406 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 65 16%
Student > Bachelor 43 11%
Researcher 39 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 9%
Other 20 5%
Other 77 19%
Unknown 127 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 73 18%
Social Sciences 27 7%
Psychology 19 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 2%
Other 50 12%
Unknown 143 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2021.
All research outputs
#674,964
of 18,893,921 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,590
of 11,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,137
of 352,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,893,921 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.