↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

What is this page? Embed badge

Interventions to enhance return‐to‐work for cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
Title
Interventions to enhance return‐to‐work for cancer patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007569.pub2
Pubmed ID
21328297
Authors

de Boer AG, Taskila T, Tamminga SJ, Frings-Dresen MH, Feuerstein M, Verbeek JH

Abstract

Cancer survivors are 1.4 times more likely to be unemployed than healthy people. It is therefore important to provide cancer patients with programmes to support the return-to-work process.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 4%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 104 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Student > Master 10 9%
Other 32 29%
Unknown 19 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 31%
Social Sciences 13 12%
Psychology 12 11%
Computer Science 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 24 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2015.
All research outputs
#2,656,461
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,320
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,891
of 105,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Cochrane Library.