↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Caesarean section versus vaginal delivery for preventing mother to infant hepatitis C virus transmission

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
Title
Caesarean section versus vaginal delivery for preventing mother to infant hepatitis C virus transmission
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005546.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul G McIntyre, Karen Tosh, William McGuire

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 109 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 17%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 32 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 12%
Psychology 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Unspecified 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 38 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,720,531
of 23,476,369 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,308
of 12,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,843
of 68,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,476,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.