| Title |
N-acetylcysteine as an adjuvant therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012357.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luís Eduardo S Fontes, Ana Luiza C Martimbianco, Carolina Zanin, Rachel Riera |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 19% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 6% |
| Russia | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Czechia | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 75% |
| Scientists | 3 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 226 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 12% |
| Researcher | 20 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 18% |
| Unknown | 80 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 12% |
| Unknown | 98 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,535,331
of 24,887,826 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,202
of 12,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,616
of 458,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#100
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,887,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,996 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.