↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
30 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
440 Mendeley
Title
Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007412.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cecily M Begley, Gillian ML Gyte, Declan Devane, William McGuire, Andrew Weeks, Linda M Biesty

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 440 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 440 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 82 19%
Student > Master 45 10%
Researcher 35 8%
Student > Postgraduate 31 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 5%
Other 79 18%
Unknown 146 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 126 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 102 23%
Social Sciences 15 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 1%
Other 26 6%
Unknown 158 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,138,217
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,593
of 12,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,791
of 447,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#56
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.