↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
28 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
672 Mendeley
Title
Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007412.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cecily M Begley, Gillian ML Gyte, Declan Devane, William McGuire, Andrew Weeks, Linda M Biesty

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 672 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 672 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 104 15%
Student > Master 58 9%
Researcher 49 7%
Student > Postgraduate 38 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 4%
Other 104 15%
Unknown 289 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 152 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 139 21%
Social Sciences 17 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 2%
Psychology 8 1%
Other 43 6%
Unknown 301 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,461,020
of 26,243,859 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,946
of 13,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,168
of 462,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#64
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,243,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.