↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Inhaled antibiotics for pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
Title
Inhaled antibiotics for pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008319.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sherie Smith, Nicola J Rowbotham, Edward Charbek

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 144 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 16%
Student > Master 17 12%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Other 8 6%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 57 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 6%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 60 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2019.
All research outputs
#15,560,927
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,853
of 12,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,939
of 351,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#195
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.4. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.