Title |
Cyclophosphamide for treating rheumatoid arthritis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2000
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001157 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maria E Suarez-Almazor, Elaine Belseck, Beverley Shea, Peter Tugwell, George A Wells |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Colombia | 1 | 1% |
Sri Lanka | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 74 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
Researcher | 5 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Other | 16 | 21% |
Unknown | 22 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 45% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Unknown | 25 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,585,435
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,032
of 12,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,876
of 39,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.