↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Effectiveness of provision of animal-source foods for supporting optimal growth and development in children 6 to 59 months of age

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
Title
Effectiveness of provision of animal-source foods for supporting optimal growth and development in children 6 to 59 months of age
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012818.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacob C Eaton, Pamela Rothpletz-Puglia, Margaret R Dreker, Lora Iannotti, Chessa Lutter, Joyceline Kaganda, Pura Rayco-Solon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 267 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 14%
Researcher 38 14%
Student > Master 38 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 40 15%
Unknown 72 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 12%
Social Sciences 20 7%
Psychology 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 44 16%
Unknown 91 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,604,205
of 15,582,553 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,305
of 11,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,389
of 268,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,582,553 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.