↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Effectiveness of provision of animal-source foods for supporting optimal growth and development in children 6 to 59 months of age

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
379 Mendeley
Title
Effectiveness of provision of animal-source foods for supporting optimal growth and development in children 6 to 59 months of age
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012818.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacob C Eaton, Pamela Rothpletz-Puglia, Margaret R Dreker, Lora Iannotti, Chessa Lutter, Joyceline Kaganda, Pura Rayco-Solon, Pamela Rothpletz‐Puglia, Pura Rayco‐Solon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 379 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 379 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 15%
Student > Bachelor 51 13%
Researcher 48 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 4%
Other 69 18%
Unknown 103 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 50 13%
Social Sciences 25 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 4%
Unspecified 12 3%
Other 68 18%
Unknown 129 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,439,173
of 21,406,274 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,384
of 12,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,308
of 284,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,406,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.