↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Systemic corticosteroids for the management of cancer-related breathlessness (dyspnoea) in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
28 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
289 Mendeley
Title
Systemic corticosteroids for the management of cancer-related breathlessness (dyspnoea) in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012704.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alison Haywood, Jacqueline Duc, Phillip Good, Sohil Khan, Kirsty Rickett, Petra Vayne-Bossert, Janet R Hardy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 289 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 13%
Student > Master 33 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 8%
Researcher 20 7%
Student > Postgraduate 17 6%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 111 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 14%
Psychology 21 7%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 1%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 123 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,652,255
of 21,053,465 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,839
of 12,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,122
of 284,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,053,465 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.