↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Systemic corticosteroids for the management of cancer‐related breathlessness (dyspnoea) in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
26 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
355 Mendeley
Title
Systemic corticosteroids for the management of cancer‐related breathlessness (dyspnoea) in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012704.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alison Haywood, Jacqueline Duc, Phillip Good, Sohil Khan, Kirsty Rickett, Petra Vayne-Bossert, Janet R Hardy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 355 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 11%
Student > Master 36 10%
Researcher 23 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 6%
Student > Postgraduate 19 5%
Other 65 18%
Unknown 149 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 13%
Psychology 21 6%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Unspecified 8 2%
Other 38 11%
Unknown 163 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,860,973
of 26,314,361 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,789
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,960
of 370,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#83
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,314,361 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.