| Title |
Iodine supplementation for the prevention of mortality and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005253.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Verena Walsh, Jennifer Valeska Elli Brown, William McGuire |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| Canada | 3 | 13% |
| Australia | 2 | 9% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 4% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 30% |
| Scientists | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 234 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 14% |
| Researcher | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 12% |
| Unknown | 86 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Psychology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 8% |
| Unknown | 97 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,245,376
of 23,847,374 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,829
of 12,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,846
of 356,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#100
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,847,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,787 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.