↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions using social networking sites to promote contraception in women of reproductive age

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
Title
Interventions using social networking sites to promote contraception in women of reproductive age
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012521.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aalaa Jawad, Issrah Jawad, Nisreen A Alwan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 196 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 16%
Researcher 24 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 4%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 68 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 33 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 15%
Social Sciences 20 10%
Unspecified 9 5%
Psychology 7 4%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 76 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,198,496
of 19,871,722 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,786
of 11,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,371
of 282,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,871,722 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.