↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions using social networking sites to promote contraception in women of reproductive age

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Interventions using social networking sites to promote contraception in women of reproductive age
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012521.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aalaa Jawad, Issrah Jawad, Nisreen A Alwan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 138 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 14%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 39 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 26 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 16%
Social Sciences 20 14%
Psychology 7 5%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 42 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,910,579
of 17,377,895 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,514
of 11,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,829
of 275,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,377,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.