↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery (SEPS) for treating venous leg ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
Title
Subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery (SEPS) for treating venous leg ulcers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012164.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhiliang Caleb Lin, Paula M Loveland, Renea V Johnston, Michael Bruce, Carolina D Weller

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 173 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 15%
Student > Master 22 13%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Postgraduate 14 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 5%
Other 30 17%
Unknown 57 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 14%
Psychology 6 3%
Unspecified 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 63 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,138,180
of 19,010,680 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,741
of 11,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,545
of 279,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,010,680 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.