The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Adjuvant gonadotropin‐releasing hormone analogues for the prevention of chemotherapy‐induced premature ovarian failure in premenopausal women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008018.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hengxi Chen, Li Xiao, Jinke Li, Ling Cui, Wei Huang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 30% |
| Canada | 2 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
| Poland | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 20% |
| Scientists | 3 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 276 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 9% |
| Other | 20 | 7% |
| Researcher | 15 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 13% |
| Unknown | 138 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 6% |
| Unknown | 153 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2024.
All research outputs
#2,452,946
of 26,549,961 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,832
of 13,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,811
of 371,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#94
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,549,961 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.