| Title |
Adjuvant gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced premature ovarian failure in premenopausal women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008018.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hengxi Chen, Li Xiao, Jinke Li, Ling Cui, Wei Huang |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 30% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Poland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 20% |
| Scientists | 3 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 236 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 12% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 9% |
| Researcher | 15 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 42 | 18% |
| Unknown | 96 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 4% |
| Psychology | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Unknown | 110 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,171,385
of 23,511,526 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,718
of 12,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,221
of 355,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#93
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,511,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.