↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Once daily long-acting beta2-agonists and long-acting muscarinic antagonists in a combined inhaler versus placebo for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
Title
Once daily long-acting beta2-agonists and long-acting muscarinic antagonists in a combined inhaler versus placebo for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012930.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Usman Maqsood, Terence N Ho, Karen Palmer, Fiona JR Eccles, Mohammed Munavvar, Ran Wang, Iain Crossingham, David JW Evans

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 175 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 18%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Researcher 14 8%
Other 13 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Other 33 19%
Unknown 52 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 6%
Psychology 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 60 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2019.
All research outputs
#3,145,994
of 22,558,544 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,828
of 12,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,945
of 288,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,558,544 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.