↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for prevention of complications after pulmonary resection in lung cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
Title
Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for prevention of complications after pulmonary resection in lung cancer patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010355.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria FS Torres, Gustavo JM Porfírio, Alan PV Carvalho, Rachel Riera

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 141 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Other 11 8%
Researcher 8 6%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 52 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 13%
Sports and Recreations 5 4%
Unspecified 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 55 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,997,017
of 18,585,396 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,267
of 11,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,474
of 277,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,585,396 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.