↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for prevention of complications after pulmonary resection in lung cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for prevention of complications after pulmonary resection in lung cancer patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010355.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria FS Torres, Gustavo JM Porfírio, Alan PV Carvalho, Rachel Riera

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 103 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Other 10 10%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 32 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 34 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,149,529
of 15,964,324 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,643
of 11,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,949
of 269,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,964,324 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.