↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Screening for prevention of optic nerve damage due to chronic open angle glaucoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
Screening for prevention of optic nerve damage due to chronic open angle glaucoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006129.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah R Hatt, Richard Wormald, Jennifer Burr

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 119 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 15%
Researcher 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 35 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 13%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 38 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#5,341,241
of 16,722,463 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,019
of 11,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,359
of 268,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#141
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,722,463 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.