↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Search strategies to identify observational studies in MEDLINE and Embase

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Search strategies to identify observational studies in MEDLINE and Embase
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.mr000041.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li, Helen E Smith, Rifat Atun, Lorainne Tudor Car

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 18%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 13%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Psychology 3 3%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 30 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,629,244
of 19,195,752 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,920
of 11,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,120
of 279,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,195,752 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.