| Title |
Search strategies to identify observational studies in MEDLINE and Embase
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.mr000041.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Li Li, Helen E Smith, Rifat Atun, Lorainne Tudor Car |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 22% |
| Japan | 2 | 11% |
| Spain | 2 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 141 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Researcher | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 53 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 62 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,121,279
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,855
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,479
of 365,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#109
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.