↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Search strategies to identify observational studies in MEDLINE and Embase

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
Search strategies to identify observational studies in MEDLINE and Embase
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.mr000041.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li, Helen E Smith, Rifat Atun, Lorainne Tudor Car

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 14%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 37 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Computer Science 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 47 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,553,893
of 23,917,011 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,311
of 12,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,227
of 354,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#105
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,917,011 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.