↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Computerised cognitive training for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in late life

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
79 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
482 Mendeley
Title
Computerised cognitive training for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in late life
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012277.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola J Gates, Anne WS Rutjes, Marcello Di Nisio, Salman Karim, Lee-Yee Chong, Evrim March, Gabriel Martínez, Robin WM Vernooij

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 482 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 482 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 118 24%
Student > Master 54 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 10%
Researcher 41 9%
Student > Bachelor 37 8%
Other 86 18%
Unknown 98 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 127 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 50 10%
Psychology 49 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 9%
Neuroscience 26 5%
Other 75 16%
Unknown 113 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2021.
All research outputs
#520,288
of 21,636,364 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,054
of 12,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,289
of 286,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,636,364 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,094 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.