↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Computerised cognitive training for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in midlife

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
460 Mendeley
Title
Computerised cognitive training for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in midlife
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012278.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola J Gates, Anne WS Rutjes, Marcello Di Nisio, Salman Karim, Lee-Yee Chong, Evrim March, Gabriel Martínez, Robin WM Vernooij

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 460 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 460 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 13%
Student > Bachelor 53 12%
Unspecified 48 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 9%
Researcher 36 8%
Other 87 19%
Unknown 138 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 14%
Psychology 53 12%
Unspecified 48 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 9%
Neuroscience 26 6%
Other 71 15%
Unknown 155 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2023.
All research outputs
#518,335
of 23,565,002 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#988
of 12,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,813
of 353,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,565,002 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.