↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Computerised cognitive training for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in midlife

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
Title
Computerised cognitive training for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in midlife
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012278.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola J Gates, Anne WS Rutjes, Marcello Di Nisio, Salman Karim, Lee-Yee Chong, Evrim March, Gabriel Martínez, Robin WM Vernooij

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 201 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 16%
Student > Bachelor 28 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 12%
Researcher 13 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 61 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 14%
Psychology 27 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 10%
Neuroscience 16 8%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 70 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,280,840
of 19,200,799 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,161
of 11,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,454
of 279,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,200,799 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.