↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pain management for inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and other spondyloarthritis) and gastrointestinal or liver comorbidity

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
351 Mendeley
Title
Pain management for inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and other spondyloarthritis) and gastrointestinal or liver comorbidity
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008951.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helga Radner, Sofia Ramiro, Rachelle Buchbinder, Robert BM Landewé, Désirée van der Heijde, Daniel Aletaha

Abstract

Even with optimal disease-modifying treatment and good control of disease activity, persistent pain due to structural damage is common in people with inflammatory arthritis and therefore additional treatment for pain might be required. Because comorbidity is highly prevalent in people with inflammatory arthritis, it is important to consider comorbidities such as gastrointestinal or liver diseases in deciding upon optimal pharmacologic pain therapy.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 351 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 344 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 15%
Researcher 39 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 11%
Student > Bachelor 31 9%
Other 21 6%
Other 69 20%
Unknown 101 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 129 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 8%
Psychology 13 4%
Social Sciences 11 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 3%
Other 40 11%
Unknown 119 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,097,390
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,779
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,439
of 245,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#82
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.