↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for smoking cessation in Indigenous populations

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
305 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for smoking cessation in Indigenous populations
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009046.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristin V Carson, Malcolm P Brinn, Matthew Peters, Antony Veale, Adrian J Esterman, Brian J Smith

Abstract

Tobacco use in Indigenous populations (people who have inhabited a country for thousands of years) is often double that of the non-Indigenous population. A disproportionate burden of substance-related morbidity and mortality exists as a result.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 2%
Germany 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 295 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 55 18%
Researcher 53 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 12%
Student > Bachelor 29 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 49 16%
Unknown 64 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 13%
Psychology 36 12%
Social Sciences 29 10%
Computer Science 7 2%
Other 35 11%
Unknown 74 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2020.
All research outputs
#781,889
of 18,034,577 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,955
of 11,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,756
of 225,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#74
of 496 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,034,577 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 496 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.