↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for smoking cessation in Indigenous populations

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
291 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for smoking cessation in Indigenous populations
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009046.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristin V Carson, Malcolm P Brinn, Matthew Peters, Antony Veale, Adrian J Esterman, Brian J Smith

Abstract

Tobacco use in Indigenous populations (people who have inhabited a country for thousands of years) is often double that of the non-Indigenous population. A disproportionate burden of substance-related morbidity and mortality exists as a result.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 291 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 2%
Germany 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 281 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 18%
Researcher 49 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 12%
Student > Bachelor 27 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 46 16%
Unknown 63 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 29%
Psychology 35 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 12%
Social Sciences 25 9%
Computer Science 7 2%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 75 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2016.
All research outputs
#1,021,483
of 21,360,407 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,394
of 12,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,201
of 248,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#84
of 470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,360,407 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.