| Title |
Surgical decompression for cerebral oedema in acute ischaemic stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003435.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Salvador Cruz‐Flores, Eivind Berge, Ian R Whittle |
| Abstract |
Large cerebral infarction has a high case fatality. Despite the use of conventional medical treatments such as hyperventilation, mannitol, diuretics, corticosteroids and barbiturates, the outcome of this condition remains poor. Decompressive surgery to relieve intracranial pressure is performed in some cases, although evidence of any clinical benefits has not been available until recently. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2002. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 19% |
| Unknown | 33 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 38 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,303,192
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,599
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,630
of 251,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#108
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.