↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
28 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
Title
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009261.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joan Webster, Zhenmi Liu, Gill Norman, Jo C Dumville, Laura Chiverton, Paul Scuffham, Monica Stankiewicz, Wendy P Chaboyer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 201 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 17%
Student > Bachelor 31 15%
Researcher 22 11%
Other 17 8%
Student > Postgraduate 11 5%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 54 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 14%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 60 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,313,614
of 17,726,748 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,346
of 11,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,034
of 277,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,726,748 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.