↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Oximes for acute organophosphate pesticide poisoning

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
9 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
Title
Oximes for acute organophosphate pesticide poisoning
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005085.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nick A Buckley, Michael Eddleston, Yi Li, Marc Bevan, Jane Robertson

Abstract

Acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning causes tens of thousands of deaths each year across the developing world. Standard treatment involves administration of intravenous atropine and oxime to reactivate inhibited acetylcholinesterase. The clinical usefulness of oximes, such as pralidoxime and obidoxime, has been challenged over the past 20 years by physicians in many parts of the world.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 157 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 17%
Student > Master 23 14%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Postgraduate 18 11%
Other 17 10%
Other 43 27%
Unknown 14 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 46%
Psychology 13 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 7%
Chemistry 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 22 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2018.
All research outputs
#812,017
of 17,361,274 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,094
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,391
of 224,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#80
of 502 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,361,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 502 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.