↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Herbal medicinal products or preparations for neuropathic pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
34 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
Title
Herbal medicinal products or preparations for neuropathic pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010528.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adele Boyd, Chris Bleakley, Deirdre A Hurley, Chris Gill, Mary Hannon-Fletcher, Pamela Bell, Suzanne McDonough

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 219 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 17%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Other 20 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Researcher 19 9%
Other 43 20%
Unknown 55 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 6%
Psychology 7 3%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 58 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2020.
All research outputs
#730,855
of 17,717,881 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,830
of 11,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,063
of 277,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,717,881 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.