↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Herbal medicinal products or preparations for neuropathic pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
29 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
283 Mendeley
Title
Herbal medicinal products or preparations for neuropathic pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010528.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adele Boyd, Chris Bleakley, Deirdre A Hurley, Chris Gill, Mary Hannon-Fletcher, Pamela Bell, Suzanne McDonough

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 283 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 17%
Student > Bachelor 33 12%
Other 27 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 8%
Researcher 19 7%
Other 51 18%
Unknown 81 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 5%
Psychology 9 3%
Other 48 17%
Unknown 88 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,006,619
of 21,770,930 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,307
of 12,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,294
of 289,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,770,930 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.