↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Herbal medicinal products or preparations for neuropathic pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
29 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
335 Mendeley
Title
Herbal medicinal products or preparations for neuropathic pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010528.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adele Boyd, Chris Bleakley, Deirdre A Hurley, Chris Gill, Mary Hannon-Fletcher, Pamela Bell, Suzanne McDonough

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 335 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 335 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 14%
Student > Bachelor 39 12%
Other 29 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 7%
Researcher 22 7%
Other 56 17%
Unknown 118 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 4%
Psychology 9 3%
Other 46 14%
Unknown 126 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,170,228
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,541
of 12,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,529
of 356,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.