↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychological therapies (remotely delivered) for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
21 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
812 Mendeley
Title
Psychological therapies (remotely delivered) for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011118.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma Fisher, Emily Law, Joanne Dudeney, Christopher Eccleston, Tonya M Palermo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 812 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 808 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 110 14%
Researcher 101 12%
Student > Bachelor 70 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 8%
Other 43 5%
Other 162 20%
Unknown 259 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 159 20%
Psychology 114 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 92 11%
Unspecified 38 5%
Social Sciences 23 3%
Other 91 11%
Unknown 295 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,224,847
of 25,634,695 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,562
of 13,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,051
of 365,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,634,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.