| Title |
Non-legislative interventions for the promotion of cycle helmet wearing by children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003985.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachel Owen, Denise Kendrick, Caroline Mulvaney, Tim Coleman, Simon Royal |
| Abstract |
Helmets reduce bicycle-related head injuries, particularly in single vehicle crashes and those where the head strikes the ground. We aimed to identify non-legislative interventions for promoting helmet use among children, so future interventions can be designed on a firm evidence base. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 18% |
| Canada | 2 | 12% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Kazakhstan | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 233 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 47 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 44 | 18% |
| Unknown | 58 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 9% |
| Psychology | 15 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 33 | 14% |
| Unknown | 73 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,213,323
of 24,911,633 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,608
of 13,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,269
of 147,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,911,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,007 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.