↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for impetigo

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
9 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for impetigo
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003261.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sander Koning, Renske van der Sande, Arianne P Verhagen, Lisette WA van Suijlekom-Smit, Andrew D Morris, Christopher C Butler, Marjolein Berger, Johannes C van der Wouden

Abstract

Impetigo is a common, superficial bacterial skin infection, which is most frequently encountered in children. There is no generally agreed standard therapy, and guidelines for treatment differ widely. Treatment options include many different oral and topical antibiotics as well as disinfectants. This is an updated version of the original review published in 2003.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brunei Darussalam 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 213 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 19%
Researcher 30 14%
Student > Bachelor 28 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 7%
Other 12 5%
Other 43 20%
Unknown 49 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 56 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,380,575
of 17,362,547 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,514
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,202
of 224,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#145
of 508 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,362,547 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 508 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.