| Title |
Interventions for impetigo
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003261.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sander Koning, Renske van der Sande, Arianne P Verhagen, Lisette WA van Suijlekom-Smit, Andrew D Morris, Christopher C Butler, Marjolein Berger, Johannes C van der Wouden |
| Abstract |
Impetigo is a common, superficial bacterial skin infection, which is most frequently encountered in children. There is no generally agreed standard therapy, and guidelines for treatment differ widely. Treatment options include many different oral and topical antibiotics as well as disinfectants. This is an updated version of the original review published in 2003. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| Japan | 1 | 11% |
| Mexico | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 320 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brunei Darussalam | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 313 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 52 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 13% |
| Researcher | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 54 | 17% |
| Unknown | 105 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 115 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 18 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Psychology | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 34 | 11% |
| Unknown | 111 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,199,113
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,737
of 12,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,566
of 246,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.