↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for impetigo

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
9 tweeters
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
290 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for impetigo
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003261.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sander Koning, Renske van der Sande, Arianne P Verhagen, Lisette WA van Suijlekom-Smit, Andrew D Morris, Christopher C Butler, Marjolein Berger, Johannes C van der Wouden

Abstract

Impetigo is a common, superficial bacterial skin infection, which is most frequently encountered in children. There is no generally agreed standard therapy, and guidelines for treatment differ widely. Treatment options include many different oral and topical antibiotics as well as disinfectants. This is an updated version of the original review published in 2003.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brunei Darussalam 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 283 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 17%
Student > Bachelor 36 12%
Researcher 31 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 6%
Other 15 5%
Other 54 19%
Unknown 88 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 5%
Psychology 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 38 13%
Unknown 92 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,259,678
of 22,100,013 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,952
of 12,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,299
of 251,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#99
of 475 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,100,013 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 475 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.