↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for impetigo

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
327 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for impetigo
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003261.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sander Koning, Renske van der Sande, Arianne P Verhagen, Lisette WA van Suijlekom‐Smit, Andrew D Morris, Christopher C Butler, Marjolein Berger, Johannes C van der Wouden

Abstract

Impetigo is a common, superficial bacterial skin infection, which is most frequently encountered in children. There is no generally agreed standard therapy, and guidelines for treatment differ widely. Treatment options include many different oral and topical antibiotics as well as disinfectants. This is an updated version of the original review published in 2003.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brunei Darussalam 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 320 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 16%
Student > Bachelor 43 13%
Researcher 33 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 6%
Other 18 6%
Other 55 17%
Unknown 106 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 120 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Psychology 8 2%
Other 34 10%
Unknown 112 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,401,423
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,988
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,193
of 251,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.