↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Radix Sophorae flavescentis versus no intervention or placebo for chronic hepatitis B

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
Title
Radix Sophorae flavescentis versus no intervention or placebo for chronic hepatitis B
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013089.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ning Liang, De Zhao Kong, Si Si Ma, Chun Li Lu, Ming Yang, Lu Da Feng, Chen Shen, Ruo Han Diao, Ling Jun Cui, Xing Yu Lu, Dimitrinka Nikolova, Janus C Jakobsen, Christian Gluud, Jian Ping Liu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 178 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 17%
Researcher 15 8%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 13 7%
Student > Postgraduate 12 7%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 63 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 12%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 72 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2019.
All research outputs
#18,016,017
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,345
of 12,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,203
of 351,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#166
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.