↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Traction for low-back pain with or without sciatica

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
Title
Traction for low-back pain with or without sciatica
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003010.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clarke, Judy A, van Tulder, Maurits W, Blomberg, Stefan EI, de Vet, Henrica CW, van der Heijden, Geert J, Brønfort, Gert, Bouter, Lex M, Clarke, J A, van Tulder, M W, Blomberg, S E I, de Vet, H C W, van der Heijden, G J M G, Bronfort, G, Bouter, L M

Abstract

Traction is used to treat low-back pain (LBP), often with other treatments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 151 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 32 20%
Researcher 26 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 12%
Student > Postgraduate 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Other 44 27%
Unknown 10 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 7%
Sports and Recreations 8 5%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 10 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,800,943
of 24,784,213 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,968
of 12,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,701
of 82,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,784,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,977 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.