↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Robot‐assisted surgery in gynaecology

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
290 Mendeley
Title
Robot‐assisted surgery in gynaecology
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011422.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Theresa A Lawrie, Hongqian Liu, DongHao Lu, Therese Dowswell, Huan Song, Lei Wang, Gang Shi

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 289 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 11%
Researcher 31 11%
Other 27 9%
Student > Master 27 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 7%
Other 44 15%
Unknown 110 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Social Sciences 7 2%
Engineering 5 2%
Other 33 11%
Unknown 126 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,007,968
of 26,617,918 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,084
of 13,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,281
of 368,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#82
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,617,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.