↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

1 blog
13 tweeters
2 Facebook pages
2 Wikipedia pages


36 Dimensions

Readers on

152 Mendeley
Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011422.pub2
Pubmed ID

Theresa A Lawrie, Hongqian Liu, DongHao Lu, Therese Dowswell, Huan Song, Lei Wang, Gang Shi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 151 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Student > Master 19 13%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Other 30 20%
Unknown 42 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 53 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2020.
All research outputs
of 17,891,883 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 11,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 223,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,891,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.