| Title |
Long‐term non‐pharmacological weight loss interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004095.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susan L Norris, Xuanping Zhang, Alison Avenell, Edward Gregg, Tamara Brown, Christopher H Schmid, Joseph Lau |
| Abstract |
Most persons with type 2 diabetes are overweight and obesity worsens the metabolic and physiologic abnormalities associated with diabetes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Turkey | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 387 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 379 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 69 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 13% |
| Researcher | 49 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 9% |
| Other | 24 | 6% |
| Other | 74 | 19% |
| Unknown | 85 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 144 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 9% |
| Psychology | 23 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 4% |
| Other | 42 | 11% |
| Unknown | 107 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2022.
All research outputs
#8,577,479
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,601
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,729
of 72,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.