The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Interventions for hand eczema
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004055.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wietske Andrea Christoffers, Pieter‐Jan Coenraads, Åke Svensson, Thomas L Diepgen, Janine L Dickinson‐Blok, Jun Xia, Hywel C Williams |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 8 | 32% |
Mauritania | 2 | 8% |
Spain | 2 | 8% |
Japan | 2 | 8% |
New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
Argentina | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 19 | 76% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
Scientists | 2 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 287 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 287 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 42 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 30 | 10% |
Researcher | 26 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
Other | 47 | 16% |
Unknown | 108 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 81 | 28% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 5% |
Psychology | 12 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
Other | 26 | 9% |
Unknown | 121 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,310,407
of 26,574,355 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,553
of 13,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,257
of 367,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#53
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,574,355 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.