| Title |
Physiotherapy for pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) types I and II
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010853.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Keith M Smart, Benedict M Wand, Neil E O'Connell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 18 | 23% |
| United States | 6 | 8% |
| Canada | 6 | 8% |
| Japan | 5 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 4% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 27 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 60 | 78% |
| Scientists | 13 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 861 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 857 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 153 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 135 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 65 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 62 | 7% |
| Other | 59 | 7% |
| Other | 164 | 19% |
| Unknown | 223 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 248 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 185 | 21% |
| Psychology | 30 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 29 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 2% |
| Other | 95 | 11% |
| Unknown | 254 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#708,009
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,307
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,161
of 316,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 254 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 254 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.