↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Biochemical tests of placental function versus ultrasound assessment of fetal size for stillbirth and small-for-gestational-age infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
55 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
Title
Biochemical tests of placental function versus ultrasound assessment of fetal size for stillbirth and small-for-gestational-age infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012245.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander EP Heazell, Dexter JL Hayes, Melissa Whitworth, Yemisi Takwoingi, Susan E Bayliss, Clare Davenport

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 169 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 18%
Student > Master 29 17%
Researcher 27 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Other 11 7%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 33 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 7%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 42 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2021.
All research outputs
#717,333
of 18,990,581 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,704
of 11,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,132
of 280,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,990,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.