↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Biochemical tests of placental function versus ultrasound assessment of fetal size for stillbirth and small-for-gestational-age infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
37 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
Title
Biochemical tests of placental function versus ultrasound assessment of fetal size for stillbirth and small-for-gestational-age infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012245.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander EP Heazell, Dexter JL Hayes, Melissa Whitworth, Yemisi Takwoingi, Susan E Bayliss, Clare Davenport

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 255 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 39 15%
Student > Master 28 11%
Researcher 27 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 7%
Other 14 5%
Other 53 21%
Unknown 76 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 5%
Unspecified 12 5%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 85 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,376,798
of 23,923,788 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,114
of 12,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,912
of 354,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,923,788 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.