↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Indoor residual spraying for preventing malaria in communities using insecticide-treated nets

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
19 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
Title
Indoor residual spraying for preventing malaria in communities using insecticide-treated nets
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012688.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leslie Choi, Joseph Pryce, Paul Garner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 186 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 19%
Student > Master 32 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 41 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 10%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Other 33 18%
Unknown 54 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,094,440
of 18,652,463 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,754
of 11,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,965
of 278,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,652,463 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.