↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Endovascular versus conventional medical treatment for uncomplicated chronic type B aortic dissection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Endovascular versus conventional medical treatment for uncomplicated chronic type B aortic dissection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006512.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pinar Ulug, James E McCaslin, Gerard Stansby, Janet T Powell

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
China 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Unknown 88 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 64%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Engineering 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 15 16%