↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Behavioural and cognitive‐behavioural group‐based parenting programmes for early‐onset conduct problems in children aged 3 to 12 years

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
99 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
349 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
436 Mendeley
Title
Behavioural and cognitive‐behavioural group‐based parenting programmes for early‐onset conduct problems in children aged 3 to 12 years
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008225.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mairead Furlong, Sinead McGilloway, Tracey Bywater, Judy Hutchings, Susan M Smith, Michael Donnelly

Abstract

Early-onset child conduct problems are common and costly. A large number of studies and some previous reviews have focused on behavioural and cognitive-behavioural group-based parenting interventions, but methodological limitations are commonplace and evidence for the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these programmes has been unclear.

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 99 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 436 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 433 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 14%
Researcher 51 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 11%
Student > Bachelor 45 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 6%
Other 70 16%
Unknown 137 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 21%
Psychology 80 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 9%
Social Sciences 31 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 1%
Other 32 7%
Unknown 156 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2021.
All research outputs
#413,827
of 26,760,626 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#661
of 13,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,240
of 262,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,760,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.