↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Single versus double volume exchange transfusion in jaundiced newborn infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Single versus double volume exchange transfusion in jaundiced newborn infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004592.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sudhin Thayyil, David Milligan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 1%
Unknown 73 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Professor 6 8%
Other 24 32%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Psychology 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 13 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2020.
All research outputs
#11,495,958
of 17,704,521 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,120
of 11,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,951
of 275,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,704,521 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.