↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Prostatic urethral lift for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
5 tweeters
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
Title
Prostatic urethral lift for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012832.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jae Hung Jung, Balaji Reddy, Karen Ann McCutcheon, Michael Borofsky, Vikram Narayan, Myung Ha Kim, Philipp Dahm

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 160 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 12%
Other 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 54 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 65 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,511,936
of 23,275,636 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,464
of 12,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,147
of 350,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,275,636 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.