↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

What is this page? Embed badge

Combined corticosteroid and long-acting beta2 -agonist in one inhaler versus inhaled corticosteroids alone for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
240 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Summary Policy documents Wikipedia Dimensions citations
Title
Combined corticosteroid and long-acting beta2 -agonist in one inhaler versus inhaled corticosteroids alone for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006826.pub2
Pubmed ID
23990350
Authors

Luis Javier Nannini, Phillippa Poole, Stephen J Milan, Annabel Kesterton

View on publisher site

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 237 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 18%
Researcher 25 10%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 7%
Other 53 22%
Unknown 62 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 111 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 5%
Psychology 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 66 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2018.
All research outputs
#4,711,832
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,071
of 12,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,616
of 199,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#133
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Cochrane Library.