↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Down-titration and discontinuation strategies of tumour necrosis factor-blocking agents for rheumatoid arthritis in patients with low disease activity

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
Title
Down-titration and discontinuation strategies of tumour necrosis factor-blocking agents for rheumatoid arthritis in patients with low disease activity
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010455.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lise M Verhoef, Bart JF van den Bemt, Aatke van der Maas, Johanna E Vriezekolk, Marlies E Hulscher, Frank HJ van den Hoogen, Wilco CH Jacobs, Noortje van Herwaarden, Alfons A den Broeder

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 151 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 16%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Other 10 7%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 45 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 53 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2021.
All research outputs
#995,819
of 20,678,629 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,378
of 12,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,900
of 286,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,678,629 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.