↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Opioids for treating dyspnoea in patients with chronic heart failure

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Opioids for treating dyspnoea in patients with chronic heart failure
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010991.pub2
Authors

Fiona A Shearer, Allan D Struthers, Robin Harbour

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2019.
All research outputs
#18,684,243
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,494
of 12,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,878
of 301,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#256
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.