↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intra-uterine insemination versus timed intercourse or expectant management for cervical hostility in subfertile couples

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Intra-uterine insemination versus timed intercourse or expectant management for cervical hostility in subfertile couples
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002809.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frans M Helmerhorst, Huib AAM Van Vliet, Twina Gornas, M J Finken, David A Grimes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 16 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 17 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2021.
All research outputs
#13,961,768
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,297
of 12,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,174
of 59,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.