↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intra‐uterine insemination versus timed intercourse or expectant management for cervical hostility in subfertile couples

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Intra‐uterine insemination versus timed intercourse or expectant management for cervical hostility in subfertile couples
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002809.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frans M Helmerhorst, Huib AAM Van Vliet, Twina Gornas, M J Finken, David A Grimes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Master 6 10%
Other 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 20 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 20 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2021.
All research outputs
#15,576,240
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,096
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,106
of 70,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.