↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cold‐water immersion (cryotherapy) for preventing and treating muscle soreness after exercise

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Cold‐water immersion (cryotherapy) for preventing and treating muscle soreness after exercise
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 1996
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008262
Authors

Chris Bleakley, Suzanne McDonough, Evie Gardner, J. Ty Hopkins, Philip Glasgow, Gareth W Davison

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 4%
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 23 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 20%
Student > Postgraduate 5 20%
Researcher 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 9 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 20%
Sports and Recreations 4 16%
Unknown 8 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2016.
All research outputs
#15,242,272
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,764
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,897
of 29,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#64
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.