↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Botulinum toxin for shoulder pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Botulinum toxin for shoulder pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008271.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jasvinder A Singh, Patrick M Fitzgerald

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 241 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 16%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 9%
Researcher 19 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 41 17%
Unknown 84 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Psychology 7 3%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 28 11%
Unknown 90 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,365,659
of 25,621,213 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,869
of 13,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,516
of 105,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,621,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.